ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   2022 NFL Free Agency (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=140812)

rcubed 03-14-2022 06:11 PM

Engram is slated to sign a one-year deal with the Jaguars, Adam Schefter of ESPN reports

IndyNorm 03-14-2022 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc (Post 225872)
I tend to agree but fixing the qb position is the only really important job Ballard has, imo. That’s all that really matters.

While QB is by far the top priority there are other high priorities that need to be addressed: LT, CB, WR (although no point here unless we get a QB), DE, S. If Ballard sits on $70M in cap space and doesn't adequately fill any of these then he needs to be shown the door.

njcoltfan 03-15-2022 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IndyNorm (Post 225946)
While QB is by far the top priority there are other high priorities that need to be addressed: LT, CB, WR (although no point here unless we get a QB), DE, S. If Ballard sits on $70M in cap space and doesn't adequately fill any of these then he needs to be shown the door.

Maybe, players don't want to play for the Colt's !!

rm1369 03-15-2022 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by njcoltfan (Post 225987)
Maybe, players don't want to play for the Colt's !!

Players don’t want to play at a discount for the Colts. And why would they? 5 years in and I still don’t see an obvious path to contention.

There are essentially two paths to true contention- a star QB that can help overcome deficiencies or a complete team with a competent QB. Yes Luck screwed Ballard but since then he hasn’t chosen a path. They sure as hell haven’t sold out everything for a star QB. Whiich is fine - it’s a tough high risk gamble. But put a complete fucking team around the mediocre QB then. Ballard refuses to shore up weaknesses though, instead opting to fix everything in the draft. Until Ballard changes and commits to one of the two valid paths the team will stay stuck in purgatory- wasting the talent he has acquired. I wouldn’t sign up on a discount for that either.

Dewey 5 03-15-2022 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by njcoltfan (Post 225987)
Maybe, players don't want to play for the Colt's !!

Or maybe Ballard thinks the cap money goes with to his next job. We Irsay should have kept Tom Telesco

Oldcolt 03-15-2022 01:36 PM

This lack of spending in free agency is getting ridiculous. Some guy (Field Yates) has pointed out that over the last 6 years the team that spent the most in free agency has increased its win total by at least 3 wins (goes from 3-7). Ballard is full of shit when he disses free agency, it is true you will 'overspend' but you also win more games. IF he is so stubborn that he refuses to spend on free agency this year because he won't 'overspend' on a player-even if it is the only way to fill a position of critical need-well to me he has a beautiful theory, but it is setting up the Colts for continued mediocrity as long as he is here and he needs to go.

https://horseshoeheroes.com/2022/03/...space-history/

Dewey 5 03-15-2022 01:59 PM

Ballard has worn out his welcome with me. I was pretty much done with him & Reich when we lost to the Raiders & Jagoffs. Time to start over again.

Chromeburn 03-15-2022 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rcubed (Post 225913)
Engram is slated to sign a one-year deal with the Jaguars, Adam Schefter of ESPN reports

Hands of stone. Deep draft of TEs, probably get one there.

Problem with TEs now is they are either blockers or big receivers. Seems very few that can do both and Colts like guys who can do both. We have Granson who should improve as a receiver. I bet they would like a do it all guy. A couple in the draft.

AlwaysSunnyinIndy 03-15-2022 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oldcolt (Post 226040)
Some guy (Field Yates) has pointed out that over the last 6 years the team that spent the most in free agency has increased its win total by at least 3 wins (goes from 3-7).


The bump in wins is only temporary, however.

Take a look at the win totals of those teams the following season:

2016: Giants +5, then -8 the next year
2017: Jaguars +7, then -5
2018: Bears +7, then -4
2019: Jets +3, then -5
2020: Dolphins +5, then -1 (with extra game from 17 game season)

ChaosTheory 03-15-2022 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlwaysSunnyinIndy (Post 226049)
The bump is wins is only temporary, however.

Take a look at the win totals the following season:

2016: Giants +5, then -8 the next year
2017: Jaguars +7, then -5
2018: Bears +7, then -4
2019: Jets +3, then -5
2020: Dolphins +5, then -1 (with extra game from 17 game season)

Right.

Also, these teams were winning like 2-5 games the season before. So they're playing last-place schedules AND making high draft picks AND spending all their money.... And a lot of times they're getting to what? 6-7 wins? And then they're right back in the cellar again when they don't play the last place schedule

By the way, you can tell without going back and reading the archives here who was happy during the off-season when Grigson bought Gore, Johnson, Cole, etc.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.