![]() |
Colts vs. Texans ... Polar Opposites in Pass Protection
o
In regard to our upcoming opponent in the Wildcard playoff game ........ The Colts led the league in the least amount of sacks allowed (18.) Guess who was DEAD LAST in allowing sacks ??? The Houston Texans (62.) http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/t.../2/order/false Not only that, but the Colts threw significantly more passes than did the Texans (644 attempts for the Colts, 506 attempts for the Texans.) COLTS AVERAGE: .,,,, 1 Sack for every 35.78 QB drop-backs. TEXANS AVERAGE: l,, 1 Sack for every .)8.16 QB drop-backs. o |
Just a shame that Colts don’t have a better pash rush to really exploit it.
|
Great, now Luck is going to get sacked 5+ times and Watson will have a lean pocket the entire game.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm a jerk-off Colts fan from New York State. What I say on a website for fans of the team never has (and never will) have any affect on the outcome of the games that are played. If Luck gets sacked 5-plus times in this week's playoff game, it will be the fault of the Colts' offensive line, and/or bad decisions made by the Colts' quarterback (Luck), and/or a tenacious pass rush by the Texans. Jinxes, whammies, and curses are nothing more than a steaming pile of shit. o |
I believe Boomer Esiason talked about this being a big problem for Watson and the fact he takes a lot of sacks and not boding well for them in the playoffs. Hope the Colts dial up some pressure.
|
Quote:
In the September 30th game between these 2 teams, Luck was sacked 4 times in 62 pass attempt (1 sack for every 15.5 drop-backs.) In that same game, Watson was sacked 7 times in only 29 pass attempts (1 sack for every 4 drop-backs.) In the rematch in Houston in early December, Luck was sacked 2 times in 41 pass attempt (1 sack for every 20.5 drop-backs.) In that same game, Watson was sacked 5 times in 38 pass attempt (1 sack for every 7.6 drop-backs.) So, the Colts had a considerable advantage on both sides of the equation in both head-to-head matchups this season ........ hence, the Colts were by no means an exception to the rule in terms of getting pressure on and sacking Watson, which is obviously a good sign for them. Also, they did a very solid job of protecting Luck in both of those games ........ the 4 sacks that he sustained in the first game is kind of high, but not when taking into consideration the fact that he had 62 pass attempts. o |
Quote:
|
Quote:
They will have a plan to contain Watson. Walk Worthy, Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
I am expecting the texicans to blitz Luck a lot
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I didn't realize how bad it was until I looked at the stats for the year
Watson sacked 62 times this season, which is just unreal. For comparison, as bas as the Colts OL has been for......what, a decade now, the most times Luck has ever been sacked in a full season was 41 It seems all sack numbers are up this year though. Colts are bucking the trend there. I don't know if the leaguewide numbers are up, but these are the stats for some of the "name" Qbs we all know Matty Ryan 42 Rodgers 49 Watson 62 Eli Manning 47, that actually is no surprise Kirk Cousins, at least he is high paid, if mediocre, 40 Derek Carr 51, they previously had a great line in Oakland/Vegas/LA/wherever the hell the Raiders play Dak Prescott 56 Stafford 40 Russell Wilson 51 |
Interesting that Wilson has been sacked that much, the narrative I keep hearing is that the OL is finally fixed in Seattle. Guess not.
|
Practically every talking head this week besides Deon Sanders is picking Colts. For some reason this makes me nervous.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
When the impact of all of these factors, among many others, are assessed, the Vegas oddsmakers are telling us that it's more likely than not that the Texans will win this game - despite the widespread media opinion that the Colts will win. I just hope the Colts don't listen to too much of that stuff. And yes, I'm aware that odds are not necessarily a true reflection of who is likely to win, but rather a product of the goal of equal betting on both sides. |
Quote:
Wilson, due to his small stature probably takes more 7 step+ drops than anybody in the NFL. It makes it easier to locate him, because teams know where his launching point will be most of the time. Also, let's not discount who his OC is in all of this. Scrotumheimer certainly contributed to Brissett's weekly beating last season. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I've consumed a lot of sports media over the last week and about the only person I've seen consistently pick against the Colts is Deon Sanders. And he's an asshole. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think it just depends on where you look. Dallas Morning News is a Texas paper and several of their writers picked the Colts. Some NFL Network people picked the Colts. Vegas says it's going to be a close game and I think the picks out there reflect that.
I heard one commentator put it well. That the Colts are the better overall team, but the Texans have 4 players that are game changers in Watt, Clowney, Watson, and Hopkins. Whereas the Colts have 3 in Luck, Hilton, and Leonard. |
Quote:
|
If we can run the ball we will win by 10 at least. If not we will win by 3, after converting a 4th down in overtime.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Terrible as analysts, but probably pretty good as Crackheads, back in the day. That's why I call them the Crackboys. I swear half of the fucking team was on crack in the mid 90's. |
Quote:
Quote:
Luck threw 32 passes today, and was not sacked once. Also, not including the 3 kneel-downs at the end of the game, he rushed 5 times for 32 yards, good for 6.4 Yards-Per-Carry. Deshaun Watson was sacked 3 times. o |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.