![]() |
L'Jarius Sneed
Rumors are rampid that the colts are going to trade for Sneed. I'm against it not because of the draft picks it would take to get him but the contract he wants and would get.
I would rather see the colts draft someone. How do others feel on the possible trade? |
I keep think Sneed might be like J C Jackson, great in the system he was in and terrible in new system and paid a ton of money. Sure didn't work out for the chargers.
|
He’s low key one of the best corners in the league. I’m not opposed to getting him. Lord knows we need cornerbacks.
|
Quote:
Sneed may not be the same player if he has to cover for an extra .5 to 1 sec. compared to what he's accustomed to. |
I’m good with it… rather have a guy that’s playing at a high level then drafting a guy and waiting for him to potentially be good in a few years
Put all the talent we can around AR while he’s on his rookie deal— offense and defense |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The main point that Holder was making was that the deal wasn't done to shoot down the tweets saying that the "deal is done" or the "deal is imminent."
And considering that it has been 8 or 9 hours since those "deal is done" tweets and there is no Rapoport or Schefter tweet announcing the trade - it looks like Holder was right. But it is pretty clear that the Colts are interested in Sneed (as are a few other teams) and have been talking with Kansas City and Sneed's agent. And the stalemate seems to be about the contract terms....Sneed wants to be the highest paid CB in terms of AAV. |
I would rather see the Colts draft Quinyon Mitchell from Toledo.
|
If the reason the Chiefs would trade him is because of his salary demands, then he should be available by a trade with a much lower draft pick(s). Anything below 3 would make this a good trade. If you have to give up a high draft pick and still pay big bucks to sign him, then I hope they pass.
|
Kinda sets a bad precedent to pay an outsider more than you paid any of your own guys
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wouldn't worry too much about this point. I think Ballard has a fairly good reputation about paying Colts players (even a few times when he didn't have to extend / restructure at the time). And the precedent has already been set - it would be a similar situation to the trade for Buckner and immediately paying him a new big contract. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now it’s go all in on Sneed or draft Mitchell |
Shefter just pretty much clowned Destin Adams. There never was a trade in place & the Colts & KC never even had a discussion. Snead ain’t coming to Indy & never was. The end.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oV8PSj-hQvw o |
Holder was just on JMV, said the same thing
Said they had discussions about signing Hunter and asked about Sneed at the combine and when they didn’t get Hunter they pretty much resigned all their own guys Said he’s expecting CB to be the round 1 pick |
Adam Schefter
@AdamSchefter Trade: Chiefs are finalizing a deal to send franchise CB L’Jarius Snead to the Titans, per league sources. Chiefs are expected to receive a 2025 3rd-round pick, in addition to a 2024 7th-round pick flop, while Snead will sign a new contract. Trade is pending physical for Sneed. https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/sta...69568109273229 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ballard, wtf?
|
How does this trade make any sense for the Titans?
Are they a CB away from competing for deep runs in the playoffs? It's dumb! From the Colts perspective...I'm sorry but I'm not in love with Sneed. The trade compensation is not a concern. It's the quality of the player vs the value of the contract. For comparison, Sneed is not anywhere in the same stratosphere as Revis island. |
I understand the frustration, but there are a lot of factors that we don't and won't ever know. Yes, the Titans got him for a 3 next year, but the Chiefs may be thinking that it's very likely that the Titans will have a high pick next year. They may have wanted a 2025 2 from the Colts, since it's much more likely that the Colts will have a much lower pick than the Titans in 2025. Then there's the issues with Sneed. First, we have no idea what the medicals on his knee are, but apparently they were concerning for several NFL teams. Many of the same people who are complaining that Ballard didn't pull the trigger on this now are the same people who would say "Ballard got fleeced by the Chiefs" if he gave up next year's 2 and Sneed suffered a season ending knee injury in camp or at the beginning of the season. Finally, the Colts have a very unique disadvantage in the NFL, as they are the only team in a division where all of their division rivals don't have a state income tax, but they do. Which leads me to the other Sneed issue, contract compensation. We'll never know if the Colts were actually in on Sneed or not, but there were rumors at one point that he wanted 22m AAV, and he ended up signing for 19m AAV. Yes, those rumors could be wrong, but I wouldn't be surprised if Sneed would want more from the Colts than he would from the Titans to compensate for the tax difference.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Constantly, perpetually, hypothesizing why the dude sits on his hands as some form of justification for him just SUCKING as a GM. Dude is just lazy and entitled and doesn't give a fuck about much other than that paycheck. |
Quote:
|
Yeah, I’m off the Sneed bandwagon. He was the most penalized cornerback in the league in 2023. He’s also 27 and coming off a serious knee injury. He’s never made a pro bowl or an all pro.
He’s a much more expensive Rock Ya-Sin. I’ll pass on that much money for that player. Also, what in the hell are the Titans doing? If Levis is really good their moves may make sense but nobody knows how good he is yet. Seems like they’re putting an awful lot of eggs in that basket. |
Honestly wasn’t a big fan of trying to get Sneed anyway, he played in a way more aggressive defense that isn’t happening here. Colts defense is built on front 4 pressure. No need to overpay a guy looking to cash out because he’s already a champion. Value just wasn’t there for the Colts especially when there’s a lot of good CBs in this years draft
|
Quote:
To me, that's the difference betwen a good GM and a bum, not planning 27 fucking years downstream, instead putting all the eggs in a basket looking to win each year. Ballard's still strategizing for 2027 being "the year" --- his strategy fucking doesn't work, the proof is in the results. 1 PO win in 8 years, no division titles.... he fucking sucks. |
We could have had Sneed but dipshit Ballard drafted the legendary QB Jacob Eason instead.
|
So the following 2023 Titans have already signed with other teams:
RB - Derrick Henry - we all know how good he is DT - Denico Autry - 11.5 sacks last year LB - Azeez Al-Shaair - starting LB with 141 tackles CB - Sean Murphy-Bunting - started 10 games last year C - Aaron Brewer Started every game last 2 years. T - Andre Dillard - Started 10 games last year. WR - Chris Moore - 5 game starter with over 400 yards receiving. CB - Kristian Fulton - Started all games played over past 3 years (35) They then have the following guys who are free agents: QB - Ryan Tannehill - again we know all about him. S - Terrell Edmunds - Their 3 safety. T - Chris Hubbard - started all 9 games until injury last year. TE - Trevon Wesco - started 10 games as the No. 2 TE. DL - Kyle Peko - started 10 games DL - Marlon Davidson - started 3 games. They have signed: RB - Tony Pollard - a rotational back, nowhere near the level of Henry WR - Calvin Ridley - will help the offense C - Lloyd Cushenberry - big money signee from Broncos, who has started every game he has played in. LB - Kenneth Murray - Chargers declined his 5th year option, a decent player, but nothing special. QB - Mason Rudolph - who cares? OL - Saahdiq Charles - Considered a bust in Washington. NT - Sebastian Joseph - cut by the Chargers towards end of last year. CB - Chidobe Awuzie - A decent player, but lost his starting role to a rookie last year. CB - L'Jarius Sneed - a very good CB Do we really think that the Titans are better after free agency???? |
Quote:
|
Because people are trying to make the point that the rest of the teams in the AFC south are suddenly so much better than the Colts. Which I just disagree with on so many levels.
The Colts philosophy has always been the draft, so our natural improvement is through the development of our own players and them improving year on year. So next year the young guys who saw playing time will be improved etc. Can you say we have got worse? If not and our roster has remained much the same, come next year we are likely to be better. Other teams have a similar philosophy and their rosters will of course develop as well. But the Colts are consistently one of the better teams in terms of the draft. We also manage our cap really well, so that we don't lose players year after year that we might want to keep. What we have missed for quite a few years is elite QB play. Which hopefully we have now secured, but that is still to be proven. In my opinion, and i know not everyone agrees with this, is that this is probably one of the best rosters i can recall the Colts having from top to bottom. The fact that we were able to be competitive in almost every game is testament to that, along with quality coaching. But coaches are meant to be getting the maximum out of players, and then making the right calls in the crucial moments of games. |
I think this cements a corner (Mitchell/Arnold) in round one now. I’m fine with that but am still a bit miffed that we haven’t brought in some more outside talent to start, provide depth, or provide a solid veteran presence. I wonder if one of Simmons, Blackmon, Clowney, or Gilmore is still within the budget.
|
I also wonder if i am actually in the minority with my opinion that the roster is good. Or if it just the whiney bitchy community who complain when the sun rises in the east each day, and that they just shout the loudest.
|
Quote:
|
The colts dodged a bullet not signing Sneed. Too much money for not a true shutdown corner
|
Quote:
Quote:
But I will say that if the Colts could've gotten him for a similar package, then I really hope their problem was that they didn't like the medicals, because the trade compensation was a bargain price and the contract he signed isn't terrible if he continues to perform at a high level and doesn't get hurt. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.