![]() |
Foreskins are gonna F%ck us
Say's Wentz is cleared to throw, but Taylor is starting at QB Sunday. So looking more and more likely Wentz's playing days in DC are done, which means he doesn't hit the threshold that turns into a 2nd. rounder for us.
|
Quote:
|
Not too surprising if they keep Heinicke the rest of the season. They've won 3/4 with him, lost the previous 4/5 with Wentz and the game Wentz won vs. CHI, he threw for 99yds.
Take the 3rd, hopefully Ballard turns it into another Okereke or Blackmon. |
o
Heinicke has played better than Wentz has ...... there is no reason for the Redskins to reinsert Wentz at quarterback, regardless of the trade stipulations that they have with the Colts. o |
Meh Whatever.
|
We fucked ourselves
|
The new GM will have to make due with what he has.
|
So they essentially spent a third round pick for the privelege of discovering that Wentz isn’t as good as a player they already had.
Neat. |
Quote:
If the Colts manage to play (at least) respectable football for the rest of this season, they may not have a new GM next year. o |
Quote:
Actually, I think that the opposite is true ...... just getting another team to take Wentz off of our hands when he still had a year left on his contract with us was a Houdini act by Ballard. If Wentz were able to play the required amount of games which would have maximized the value of that trade, it would have simply been icing on the cake ...... but we still got the cake overall (with or without the icing.) o |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Washington traded more than just a 2023 conditional draft pick. They also traded a third round pick in the 2022 draft (Colts selected Jelani Woods) as well as swapped 2022 second round picks with the Colts so that Indy could move up a few spots in the draft order. |
I hate the fact that we suddenly have these types of connections with Washington.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The problem isnt finding talent, its getting it to produce. Thats on the coaching staff. Saturday may be out at the end of the year. This group could go back to their lazy ways. Last week, they played close to their potential. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If Ballard leaves we still have Dodds and Brown. I think either one of them could step in and do a fine job, who knows, maybe better.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don’t think either of those guys will want to hang around and be Jim’s lackey. |
Quote:
Wentz sucks, He is too not smart for being a NFL starting QB. I'm trying to be nice about him. lol He would be awesome if his brain matched his arm strength.. lol JMO |
Quote:
Ballard should've been packing and walking the road of shame with Frank. IMO Ballard doesn't know how to draft or get FA for depth. He only cares about his players he got and not the team as a whole. He doesn't want to spend money and it isn't even his money he is spending!! That is probably the reason Irsay may keep him aboard for mediocre team. Irsay wants to win.. Says all chips are on the table... Well stop trying to bluff everyone and make the bet!!!! |
Quote:
Not spending money? Click on the link. As to building a team, thats nonsense. The O line has dramatically under preformed, which screws up everything. We lost the best punter/kickoff specialist (who drafted him?) before the season started. Huge loss in terms of field position. Yes there have been changes on the O line. Last years returning starters have sucked. Thats on them, not Ballard. |
Quote:
Keep praying for Ballard to bring us winners that win a SB... I am and will die before it happens |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I see were changes need to be made. Ballard talking about winning in the trenches. Yes you do, but I have seen how the game and rules have changed since growing up from the 80's. DB' cant do shit and defense has to lay off QB's a bit. Fine it is a safety concern they say anyhow. WR passing favorite league, and safety concussion protocols. I'm good with it until the defense can't do its job. So DBs less contact omg WR has a edge and a QB does too. Lets just keep spending $20 million in guards and less than $20 mil in RB's but still damn good money for RB2 we are not going keep... I love you too Ballard.. Keep up the good work!!! |
Quote:
Frank as won more games than Ballard with shit QBs. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why wouldn’t they want to leave and go somewhere where they’re actually running things instead of an old hippy owner? |
So if Crappybeerguy starts one more game after Sunday, we get a 3rd rounder because Wentz will no longer be able to reach 70 percent of the snaps.
We have to hope Crappybeerguy plays like shit and/or gets hurt. (To clarify, I’m not hoping he gets hurt. Just saying it would be beneficial to the Colts.) |
Quote:
Ballard has a good record finding talent. The Online was considered one of the best until that group totally failed. The remaining linemen have played well below their past efforts. You cant blame Ballard for the player preformance. That is on the coaching staff. Finding a Qb is on both Ballard and Irsay. They should have tanked the season when Luck was put on the IR, But they didnt. They traded for Brisset and went .500. Because they thought Luck still gave them 5-6 years of play. Jim Irsay will not tank a season. He is not his father. Yeah, he is eccentric, but he knows people. Hiring Saturday as HC, he gets a smart guy who will let the asst coaches do their job, he is going to establish the ATTITUDE. Oh, putting Ryan back at Qb is Irsay not tanking. Saturday didnt come in to tank. He came in to put up a fight. They could have hired any one off the street to tank. Yeah, Irsay may be half a bubble of plumb, he isnt a quitter, and the Colts arent tanking. Fuck that shit. Go down swinging. I can get behind that kind of crazy |
Quote:
He’s never before meddled like this and there’s no reason to believe he won’t continue to do so. Besides, he’s already made it clear he doesn’t trust Ballards judgement because Ballard was against hiring Saturday. I’m not saying I think Ballard ought to be fired, I just think it’s inevitable now that he’s either fired or he leaves on his own. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also, if Nelson's struggles are due to lingering lower back problems or some other physical problem then signing him to such a huge contract could end up being a bad move as well. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
WAS is averaging about 70.3 snaps per game with Wentz and 70.5 snaps with Heinicke (pretty consistent). So WAS gets 70.4 snaps per game which would be about 1,197 snaps for the season, 838 would be 70%. So Wentz would need another 416 snaps on top of the 422 he's already had. That's 59.4 snaps per game over the final 7 games... or 69.3 snaps per game over 6 games. Both are below WAS current average. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.