![]() |
Quote:
|
I have decided to like or not like this deal based on if any of our other young receivers step up and become "trusted" by Luck.
If Dorsett, Swoope or Rogers step it up, then we will not miss Allen at all and the deal was great. If no one steps up, then it was a bad trade. Time will tell. Cheers, Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
I could have seen him being cut after this year anyway so I'm okay with the trade. Wish we wouldn't have given our 6th round pick away, but whatever. It also sucks that we gave anything to the Patriots.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Teams make decisions all the time to move on from high priced talent because they have lower priced talent behind them that they believe will fill the void left. Trading Allen created a void as a receiving option on the 2017 Colts. I am going to judge that trade based on if the lower priced talent on the team fills the void or not. If the offense don't not skip a beat in 2017, then good trade. If it struggles because no one steps up as a 4th trusted pass catching option, then bad trade. What is hard to understand about that? Cheers, Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk |
Quote:
I'm telling you that he definitely bitched about the way he was used. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.