Don’t know, the mantra now is coach these guys up. Is he Mahomes or Winston? Most of his turnovers and bad decisions happened in the second half when his team was behind and he was playing hero ball to keep them in it. If his junior and senior years were swapped would you feel better about him as a prospect?

I wouldn't be opposed to this (post combine) mock draft.

Don't know if the author is a Colts fan or what.....


https://thedraftnetwork.com/articles...l-sikkema-2020


He has the Colts staying put at Pick 13 and drafting........Tua :eek: :cool:

And then selecting Neville Gallimore at Pick 34.

I think you’d start a rookie at RT and slide Smith in to RG. I’d take a QB or DT over OT if someone worth the pick is still there, but otherwise I like OT. The next major need is obviously WR, but the talent pool is so deep this year you should be able to get a good prospect outside the 1st round. If they are going to draft a QB this year or next I don’t want a young QB starting with a rookie or subpar LT.

Yes, that would not break my heart. :cool:

Of course, but that doesn't mean that we should just ignore that the quality of his play has gone down considerably over the last season. I understand the "hero ball" concept for a team like LSU, but he was making the same bad reads and mistakes against Nevada. I don't think I'd be comfortable with him at 13.

Honestly, you can never put too much emphasis on the O-line.

And a rookie picked at #13 would start immediately. At right OT. Sliding Smith inside to right OG would upgrade two positions and make our line even better while giving us a quality 6th man in Glowinski (assuming Haeg gets paid in free agency to leave us).

We are one OT injury away from offensive line turning into a liability and you talk about too much emphasis on O-line??

That's the dream. Throw in a WR at 44 and that's a great first 2 rounds.

Like Laviska Shenault?

Swap Aiyuk for Shenault and I'm down with that draft.

Tua won't be there at 13.