Ballard already knows Brissett cant get us anywhere which is why he went out and got Rivers.... so if we lose our starting QB... Rivers... we are not going far... with or without Brissett on the team.. so why keep him?

Because no one is going to trade for him and if Rivers gets dinged up JB can win a game or two if needed. Colts are all in this yr.Next yr hes off the books as is AL IIRC so that gives them even more options

I can see that.Good point

o


The name of his new daughter ........ "Indiana."



Mike Epps Introduces Daughter, Indiana

(By Annie Martin)

https://www.upi.com/Entertainment_Ne...6981584980987/

o

o


Epps did have a little spat with his other daughter (who was 18 year-old at the time) back in 2012, saying that he would "fuck her up", that she "was the fucking Devil", and that he would "shove it up her ass."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rpx8tr80iY


o

Naptown representative

I say you keep both QBs. They're both off the books after next season, and at this point, you don't even know if you have a season or if you do, how that season gets played out.

o

Sounds prudent.

All things considered, the Brissett situation is not disastrous ........ the Colts are paying a quarterback for one additional season that they (in hindsight) would rather not, as opposed to 3 or 4 additional seasons.

o

I guess this is like when they sent all those 19-0 SB champions shirts to Africa

What did Kraft do that the federal government didn't do? Buy a bunch of fucked up masks. Do some fucking research C&O. Can't trust China to do anything worth a damn. They are the ones who started all this shit. Fuck them and the Patriots.