ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)

- Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)

- - 2020 draft thread (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=95886)

Article on WR's that will be available outside the 1st round

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...irstround-pick

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 154788)

Article on WR's that will be available outside the 1st round

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...irstround-pick

I'm partial to Aiyuk and Hamler. To me Aiyuk at 34 would be a steal.

Quote:

Originally Posted by YDFL Commish (Post 154822)

I'm partial to Aiyuk and Hamler. To me Aiyuk at 34 would be a steal.

I like Hamler. He could be a scary skitterbug player that impacts special teams too.

I think Reagor will be drafted lower than he should because he didn't have a good Qb throwing to him.

I'm wary of Aiyuk, but I want guys that are good route runners. I feel like we get these athletes that don't know the intricacies of routes and it takes three years to teach them.

Love might be rising into the top ten.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...ve-into-top-10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 153971)

We don’t need to trade up for an LT. There are plenty in this draft. Unless you want the very best one. But we could sit at 13 or even trade down and still get a decent LT in this draft. We could get one in the 2nd, might be more of a gamble. But that’s how many there are this draft.

But everything starts with that QB position. If they trade up, it’s for a QB. If we stay with JB, and don’t draft one, then it’s a rebuild year and probably embracing mediocrity again. If they like love, they might be able to trade back a little and get him. But it starts to get risky there. You fuck around too much and someone will jump in front of you and take your guy. And yeah there is the FA vet route as well. That is a win now proposition.

If they stick with JB and Castonzo retire, we probably draft LT
If we stick with JB and Castonzo stays, we probably draft DT
If we go FA vet QB and Castonzo leaves, we probably draft LT
If we go FA vet QB and Castonzo stays, we probably draft WR

Or we go after a QB in the draft

Yes, I want the best if I'm trading up for him. Yes if I want my QB upright at the end of the season. Yes, if I want a 10 year LT and as an owner I want to sleep at night

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 154960)

Love might be rising into the top ten.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...ve-into-top-10

Me too! Whoops, you were talking about football. Damn!

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 155017)

Me too! Whoops, you were talking about football. Damn!

Ok, you get one dad joke for the day. You're cut off.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 154960)

Love might be rising into the top ten.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...ve-into-top-10

I just don't see it. He makes big highlight plays, and his supporting cast hurt him a lot last year, but he misreads and misfires way too often. If a team spends a top ten pick on him, they'll probably regret it. If the Colts take him at 13, I'll be worried and hoping for the best.

I hope we spend money in free agency in such a way that it frees us up to take an OT with our first pick. I want the line to stay dominant. Castanzo signing for only one year worries me. It is very hard to get a good left tackle thru free agency or in later rounds. There is no obvious answer at quarterback which is why every damn qb is somehow associated with us. It will be interesting how Ballard goes about constructing this team

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oldcolt (Post 155152)

If Castonzo was leaving maybe. But you don’t spend a first round pick, and number 13 at that, on a player that won’t even start for a few years. There is too much talent in this draft to pick a non starter. And we had a dominant oline last year and it got us 7 wins. I think this fanbase might be putting a little too much emphasis on oline.