ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Le'Veon Bell Wants to be a Colt (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=63155)

DrSpaceman 12-24-2018 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pez (Post 100651)
He's a wr2 on our team. Anyone who doesn't think he is better than Inman, Roger's or grant is not being honest.

As much as I think it's a bad idea and not a great fit long term, he will excel here.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

He would excel here, I don't doubt that

But the question is, is he worth the money he wants. And is it better to spend money on a RB when WR, secondary, pass rush are still huge needs for this team, much more so than RB.

Dam8610 12-24-2018 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrSpaceman (Post 100654)
He would excel here, I don't doubt that

But the question is, is he worth the money he wants. And is it better to spend money on a RB when WR, secondary, pass rush are still huge needs for this team, much more so than RB.

Imagine if Nyheim Hines was bigger, could pass block, and had the ability to play every down. That's Le'veon Bell. By signing him, you're upgrading your WR group, and he's probably the best option for that this upcoming offseason outside of the draft, unless you don't mind age and like Golden Tate.

Luck4Reich 12-24-2018 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrSpaceman (Post 100654)
He would excel here, I don't doubt that

But the question is, is he worth the money he wants. And is it better to spend money on a RB when WR, secondary, pass rush are still huge needs for this team, much more so than RB.

I'm not leaning towards Bell but you do realize there is a possibility to add him and still have 80+ million in cap.space to.add plenty of talent elsewhere if available?

TheMugwump 12-24-2018 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oldcolt (Post 100623)
He is a playmaker. This team needs them and it is going to be difficult to get anyone who is the player Bell is where we are going to draft. I know he was a second round pick, but he is All-Pro. I know you can get by with someone 'off the streets' (Johnny Unitas was 'off the streets' after all) but I would rather add an All-Pro for money (nobody here know what it will take to sign the guy. I don't want us to break the bank but we should talk to the guy) and focus on defense in the draft

Love the Johnny U reference.

Dam8610 12-24-2018 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoLuck4Chuck (Post 100669)
I'm not leaning towards Bell but you do realize there is a possibility to add him and still have 80+ million in cap.space to.add plenty of WR and secondary talent?

The WR talent in free agency next year is terrible.

Chromeburn 12-24-2018 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 100674)
The WR talent in free agency next year is terrible.

Yup, Bell is also probably the best receiver available as well. And we could split Bell out and still have Mack or Hines behind the QB.

Dam8610 12-24-2018 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 100675)
Yup, Bell is also probably the best receiver available as well. And we could split Bell out and still have Mack or Hines behind the QB.

There are so many creative things that could be done offensively with Bell and Hines on the field at the same time.

Luck4Reich 12-24-2018 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 100674)
The WR talent in free agency next year is terrible.

Not the point I was making there numbnuts.
The OP talked about not having money to spend on other positions if we signed Bell.

Dam8610 12-24-2018 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoLuck4Chuck (Post 100677)
Not the point I was making there numbnuts.
The OP talked about not having money to spend on other positions if we signed Bell.

It doesn't matter how much cap space you have to add to a position if there's no talent at the position worth adding.

FatDT 12-24-2018 03:03 PM

I don’t get the passion on either side of this debate.

Ballard’s history says he won’t sign Bell for the money he wants.

Just about everyone agrees Bell has proven he is a great player.

We have an embarrassment of cap space.

If Ballard did sign him, it would be a departure from what Ballard has done so far.

If Ballard did sign him, he would probably excel here and be very exciting to watch.

If Ballard signs him, IMO he’s earned enough credit to get the benefit of the doubt. I don’t think he will ruin the team’s culture to sign Bell. If he thinks Bell is a good player to bring in, I’ll believe that until I have a reason to stop.

If Ballard doesn’t sign him, our offense will probably still be very exciting to watch, and will be improved next year. And we’ll have that much more money to use elsewhere.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.