ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum
Page 4 of 8 « First 23 4 56 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Cowboys-Colts quick thoughts (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=62489)

TheMugwump 12-16-2018 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by indycolts2 (Post 98805)
I'm not doubting your seeing the calls against the Colts in replay but in no way did Castonzo deserve a block in the back penalty when they called that.
This, plus the non-flag on Prescott's intentional grounding. That ball was 5 yards short of the LoS and at the feet of a lineman.

omahacolt 12-16-2018 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt Classic (Post 98794)
He's still on his fairly cheap contract until 2022, but who wants a safety that doesn't show up on the stat sheet much? I can't imagine he'd return even a 4th.
I will take it

Chromeburn 12-16-2018 10:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt (Post 98808)
I will take it
I’d rather wait and see how he does next season. If he does better and you still want to trade him, then he raised his value. If not then his value stays about the same. But his talent is worth it to me to have another year. And he does seem to be doing his job, I haven’t read any complaints about him from the coaches.

Hoopsdoc 12-16-2018 10:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMugwump (Post 98807)
This, plus the non-flag on Prescott's intentional grounding. That ball was 5 yards short of the LoS and at the feet of a lineman.
I was disappointed that Reich didn’t seem to throw much of a fit over that.

Also, isn’t that reviewable?

FatDT 12-16-2018 10:24 PM
Regarding.Hooker. I was excited about him when we drafted him. I love a playmaking, ball-hawking safety. But either he isnt’ who we thought, or he is wasted in this defense. Either way, if we were able to trade him for a 3rd or better, I would be happy with that. I just don’t think it is going to work out. I’m not mad at Hooker either. I just don’t think it’s a good fit.

GoBigBlue88 12-16-2018 10:52 PM
Eh, I'm OK with Hooker still erasing big plays on the back end. There's presumably a reason teams aren't airing it out against the Colts. Sure, if you can get a high pick and argue a 2nd-3rd round safety could do the same thing in this system, have at it. But for now, I'm OK with riding Hooker deep.

nate505 12-16-2018 10:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daedge (Post 98667)
It's just nice to really care about this team again. I mean, I never stopped really caring, but it was soul destroying watching them in recent years. It was a case of watching them and not caring. There was next to nothing to get excited about. I even stopped yelling at the TV, or punching the air, when a call went against us. Like I said, it was soul destroying. Yet I still watched the depressing train-wreck of a Pagano coached team.

Thank goodness that era is over. Now, the chest pounding is back when Autry slams a punk like Dak into the turf.

There is reason to believe. I'm shitty again when the Colts lose, and my day is made when they win.

GO COLTS.
I definitely cared as little as possible the last two years. I even missed a few games which I pretty much never do. I'm glad I'm back to my usual routine, with me panicking that I may hear the score of the game before I get back home to it on my DVR when I have to do crappy xmas stuff during the holidays.

southside asshole 12-16-2018 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBigBlue88 (Post 98827)
Eh, I'm OK with Hooker still erasing big plays on the back end. There's presumably a reason teams aren't airing it out against the Colts. Sure, if you can get a high pick and argue a 2nd-3rd round safety could do the same thing in this system, have at it. But for now, I'm OK with riding Hooker deep.
Is Hooker that scary in coverage, or is it just the presence of a body back there deep making intermediate passes more appealing targets?

nate505 12-16-2018 11:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by indycolts2 (Post 98695)
#4: Yes the Colts absolutely lock up Kelly in off season!
The plus side to never using anything on free agency is that Ballard should be able to lock up Kelly/Nelson/Leonard/etc. with no worries at all.

omahacolt 12-16-2018 11:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBigBlue88 (Post 98827)
Eh, I'm OK with Hooker still erasing big plays on the back end. There's presumably a reason teams aren't airing it out against the Colts. Sure, if you can get a high pick and argue a 2nd-3rd round safety could do the same thing in this system, have at it. But for now, I'm OK with riding Hooker deep.
Watch him game in and game out. There isn’t much he is doing. Period. He isn’t constantly erasing deep throws.

And he does not want to come tackle


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 PM.
Page 4 of 8 « First 23 4 56 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.