PFF doesn't produce a single thing that isn't subjective, so all that means is PFF is biased against the Colts RBs.

I think our running backs are bad and near the bottom of the league.

You can't rely on a 33 year old RB as your primary option. Hopefully Mack will emerge and can split carries about 50-50 with Gore.

Not quite true. All of their "grades" are subjective and I am beginning to really lean against trusting them (I know, I know....I have been their biggest fan....)

However, they sometimes use pure # of snaps or pure performance numbers (yards, tackles, etc) as evidence to some of their points and I think that you can trust those types of numbers to be pretty accurate.

But the grades? Yeah, becoming less and less of a fan every month.

Cheers,

Apparently we also rank as the 25th offensive arsenal in the NFL. WTF! :rolleyes:

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/2...017-nfl-season

That's what happens after years of Grigson, you suck across the board.


[sarcasm] Pagano covered up Grigson's shortcomings:rolleyes: [/sarcasm]

I feel even dumber having read through that list.

How is Carolina ranked 12th on that list? Kelvin Benjamin sucked last year and there have basically no one behind him. Greg Olsen is good but your primary target can't be a TE.

See my above post........

I'd say it's deserving. Last year they were 23rd and they start this year with a HUGE question mark at QB, which on this team means everything. If Luck is healthy all season, the Colts easily surpass all expectations (except for a few of freaks members) for the season. As for the running backs? They need some serious upgrading at this position.

Looking on the bright side either we prove all of the naysayers wrong or we finally get rid of Clappy and his wood chopping dipshits. Either way we win.