ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Dontari Poe to Colts? (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=37039)

Butter 03-15-2018 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puck (Post 59434)
I have heard for years and years that we are going to stop the run

Our division is built to run on everyone. Poe would have been an outstanding addition to make this happen

I'm not in panick mode but WTF Ballard?? It's not coming out of your pocket Chris!!!

I don't disagree with you, but I also don't have any idea what was offered and if Poe had any interest.

Dam8610 03-15-2018 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Butter (Post 59478)
Would you sign with the Colts with an uncertain QB situation in a state that is inland and colder for the same money as a coastal City in a temperate climate with a team who has been constantly competitive? It would take a fair amount more for me to sign with the Colts unless I was a native, this is not hard math here. Once Luck comes back and proves he is still a top 10 QB then players will want to come here on fair contracts.

You're putting too much emphasis on weather, and a lot of the teams free agents have been signing with are in worse situations than the Colts. I think he would've signed with the Colts for a similar deal, maybe they would've had to beat Carolina's offer, but not by much. That said, as of the time of this post, Suh and Richardson are still on the market, and either would make a great 3-tech, which is a need.

Indiana V2 03-15-2018 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 59487)
You're putting too much emphasis on weather, and a lot of the teams free agents have been signing with are in worse situations than the Colts. I think he would've signed with the Colts for a similar deal, maybe they would've had to beat Carolina's offer, but not by much. That said, as of the time of this post, Suh and Richardson are still on the market, and either would make a great 3-tech, which is a need.

I know Suh won't be cheap, and he can be a punk, but I wouldn't mind having him on the Colts.

FatDT 03-15-2018 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indiana V2 (Post 59498)
I know Suh won't be cheap, and he can be a punk, but I wouldn't mind having him on the Colts.

He wants money. He won't get the most here. So he's not coming here.

1965southpaw 03-15-2018 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FatDT (Post 59506)
He wants money. He won't get the most here. So he's not coming here.

Agreed.....and as I've said before he's very attuned to the impact of taxes on his money. If he has a choice of Seattle or Indy he is choosing Seattle

http://www.businessinsider.com/ndamu...anation-2018-3

Puck 03-15-2018 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1965southpaw (Post 59507)
Agreed.....and as I've said before he's very attuned to the impact of taxes on his money. If he has a choice of Seattle or Indy he is choosing Seattle

http://www.businessinsider.com/ndamu...anation-2018-3


The difference in what he would pay in taxes to be here other than somewhere else is minimal..... easily paid by Ballard.


It's not out bidding it has more to do with location and who the QB is. IMO

Chromeburn 03-16-2018 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1965southpaw (Post 59507)
Agreed.....and as I've said before he's very attuned to the impact of taxes on his money. If he has a choice of Seattle or Indy he is choosing Seattle

http://www.businessinsider.com/ndamu...anation-2018-3

Thought I heard Jax was in the running as well.

Chromeburn 03-16-2018 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puck (Post 59509)
The difference in what he would pay in taxes to be here other than somewhere else is minimal..... easily paid by Ballard.


It's not out bidding it has more to do with location and who the QB is. IMO

Cost of living is lower though. Hard to compete with no taxes but if taxes are close...

Chaka 03-16-2018 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 59513)
Cost of living is lower though. Hard to compete with no taxes but if taxes are close...

Keep in mind that it's not a simple as a non-tax state vs. a taxed state. Even when their home team is in a tax-free state, a pro athlete will still have to pay taxes in all of the other states where they earn their living. This means that a player will pay taxes, at a minimum, in any state where they play a game. An athlete's taxes are enormously more complicated than most. Here's an article that covers the topic if you're interested

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbad.../#403fd7cb411e

Their home state is the most important, but it doesn't shield them from state income taxes.

Butter 03-16-2018 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 59487)
You're putting too much emphasis on weather, and a lot of the teams free agents have been signing with are in worse situations than the Colts. I think he would've signed with the Colts for a similar deal, maybe they would've had to beat Carolina's offer, but not by much. That said, as of the time of this post, Suh and Richardson are still on the market, and either would make a great 3-tech, which is a need.

I am not making it a primary factor, but a part of the whole package.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.