ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   quick thoughts on this epic battle between afc super bowl contenders (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=19188)

omahacolt 09-25-2017 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coltsalr (Post 29433)
So are you blaming Ballard now?

Anyone but pagano

Chaka 09-25-2017 10:54 AM

Any thoughts about Pierre Desir? It looked to my untrained eye like he filled in well under the circumstances.

GoBigBlue88 09-25-2017 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaka (Post 29447)
Any thoughts about Pierre Desir? It looked to my untrained eye like he filled in well under the circumstances.

Also untrained eye: he looks like OK depth. I wouldn't want him starting, but he might be a fine CB4 or CB5.

YDFL Commish 09-25-2017 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoBigBlue88 (Post 29453)
Also untrained eye: he looks like OK depth. I wouldn't want him starting, but he might be a fine CB4 or CB5.

Yep, yet he's leaps and bounds better than #42, who wouldn't be on my team if not for Pagano's complete incompetence.

1965southpaw 09-25-2017 12:30 PM

I think we've also been remiss in not mentioning that Ballard has filled the big shoes of Patty Mac with someone that 3 games into the season seems to be performing well and looks to be a viable long term solution. I'm too lazy to look this up but recall hearing that he's 4 in the league in net yards on his punts. Not sure if that includes yesterday's game or not.

GoBigBlue88 09-25-2017 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1965southpaw (Post 29464)
I think we've also been remiss in not mentioning that Ballard has filled the big shoes of Patty Mac with someone that 3 games into the season seems to be performing well and looks to be a viable long term solution. I'm too lazy to look this up but recall hearing that he's 4 in the league in net yards on his punts. Not sure if that includes yesterday's game or not.

What he lacks in some of McAfee's power and panache, he makes up for in accuracy. McAfee was a terrific punter (even if I find him obnoxious now), but he was more leg and athleticism than accuracy. It's kinda cool to have a punter who can dime a ball on the sidelines and prevent a return from ever happening.

Nice kickoffs yesterday, too.

1965southpaw 09-25-2017 06:49 PM

Rick Venturi was on JMV today and gave his analysisand while I hate how much he humble brags I do tend to agree with his analysis......He hit on all of the points others have raised here.....the only thing he mentioned that hasn't been covered here is he would give one of 2 offensive game balls to Chud (the other to Jacoby)......reason being he feels that this was the first game in a few years where we have been able to make teams pay for blitzing on us defensively. In his tape review he said that our offense made 6 huge offensive plays by successfullly dealing with their blitz. My memory is not the best and I'm too lazy to look things up but I do recall some of our ugliest losses have been we can't read and adjust to blitzes (ex last few times we played steelers) so this resonated with me.

apballin 09-25-2017 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChoppedWood (Post 29380)
We just barely held off a team that won one game last year. Actually, if our coach wasn't such a worthless putz we might be 2-0 with Brissett. All the more evidence that our coaching sucks and is the peak of a tall stack of problems.

I don't give a fuck what they did last year, Big Ben nor Flacco put up the numbers Brissett did vs that defense

And our coach didn't lose the AZ game a BS roughing the passer and Brissetts only bad throw did

Butter 09-25-2017 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1965southpaw (Post 29558)
Rick Venturi was on JMV today and gave his analysisand while I hate how much he humble brags I do tend to agree with his analysis......He hit on all of the points others have raised here.....the only thing he mentioned that hasn't been covered here is he would give one of 2 offensive game balls to Chud (the other to Jacoby)......reason being he feels that this was the first game in a few years where we have been able to make teams pay for blitzing on us defensively. In his tape review he said that our offense made 6 huge offensive plays by successfullly dealing with their blitz. My memory is not the best and I'm too lazy to look things up but I do recall some of our ugliest losses have been we can't read and adjust to blitzes (ex last few times we played steelers) so this resonated with me.

The first half play calling was excellent, playing to the strengths. I am willing to accept that the second half is probably on Pagano going full prevent. Not a huge Chud fan, but he did a great job in the first half.

ChoppedWood 09-25-2017 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by apballin (Post 29577)
I don't give a fuck what they did last year, Big Ben nor Flacco put up the numbers Brissett did vs that defense

And our coach didn't lose the AZ game a BS roughing the passer and Brissetts only bad throw did

Do you ever actually like watch football - ever?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.