![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Just remember everyone, there were "no franchise QBs" in the 2017 draft, either.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I would take Stroud over any qb in this draft. But that's me & I'm not the one making the pick.
|
Quote:
Mainly bringing up the Young consensus in response to the talk about CHI potentially keep the pick and taking him. Which I could see because you can surely upgrade from Fields at QB. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So as a Stroud advocate, why do you think (trustworthy) guys would rate him below Young even despite his small size? Which is a significant concern. |
I would stay put. Trading up to 1 would likely cost a 2024 1st and that will be a talented draft and I don't want to lose a 1st in that draft.
Nightmare scenario is: Bears trade out and a QB gone. Houston takes QB. Cards decide they want a better thrower or trade out and a QB is taken. That leaves us with Anderson or Carter. Trade down and take a QB later or take Richardson. One of the top three should be there. Hopefully, 2 of them will be. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also, yes, I am pretty high on Stroud. He grades pretty closely to another former Ohio State QB, Joe Burrow, in my opinion. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I will say that as much as Mac Jones/Tua appears to be scaring people off Bryce Young due to the Alabama factor that the same could absolutely apply with Stroud with Fields/Haskins.
The idea that these guys had elite weapons that could run circles around inferior competition absolutely has merit. I do believe that Bryce Young has a superior ability to create offense where nothing is there (that I haven’t seen from Stroud and certainly not from Richardson/Levis). Again, please don’t read this as Bryce Young love. I don’t love the guy but he IS the highest on my board and I do want the Colts to trade up what it takes to get him and put him in alongside Harbaugh and see what happens. |
Quote:
As far as his ability to create, that (and the size) is where my Russell Wilson comp for him comes from. Young creates in a similar fashion to Russell Wilson. When his offense gets off schedule, he will start using his athleticism to run around and gain yardage on the ground, occasionally also using it to escape pressure and make insane throws few other QBs could make. I disagree with your opinion on Stroud and his ability to create. He absolutely has incredible athleticism, but the way he tends to use it to create is similar to Aaron Rodgers. He'll escape pressure and roll out, but whether he rolls left or right, he almost constantly has his eyes downfield looking to make plays in the passing game rather than taking off running with the ball. This often results in him getting unexpected completions, first downs, and touchdowns that are entirely the result of him escaping pressure and buying time. Watch the first TD in the Georgia game for a perfect example of this. I don't understand where this argument that Stroud can't improvise or create comes from, but it's completely inaccurate. As a side note, I don't know where this Parris Johnson is a top 15 pick talk comes from? He must be like 19 years old or something, because on film, he grades out as a low Day 2 to high Day 3 pick. He was terrible at protecting Stroud's blindside. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Stroud should be a slam dunk for the #1 pick, I don't know why he isn't. |
All I know is that Burrow was the most accurate college passer that I have ever seen.
|
None of the top 4 QB's in this draft are worth trading future draft picks to move up 3 spots for any of the QB's that scream bust more than franchise QB.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dude, Stroud is not a can't miss generational talent. He is not worth trading any draft capitol from next year to leap frog anyone to get him. He's just not. All I will say is, I am glad you're not the GM or scout for the Colts. We would be light years away from competing for anything. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
There is not a single QB that is worth moving up from the 4th pick for.
The Cardinals and Bears are not taking a QB, so we've got our choice, after the Texans. Also show me a team with the draft capital and the issue that they are not heavily invested in a franchise QB. I only see possibly Seattle if they sour on Geno Smith. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.