![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If they asked him to take less money, then it makes sense but I am not into the cap enough to know whether or not Dam's side of that argument or Omaha's is correct. |
Teams find money for players they want. Rams found a way to pay Darnold 20 million, we could easily have found a way to pay Pittman.
|
Quote:
In a way, both are correct. If Pittman were still on the Colts roster, the Colts would be over the cap right now. But if the Colts really wanted to keep him, they could have restructured one or more contracts and pushed current cap money originally earmarked for this season into the future. Of course, some teams get into cap trouble by repeatedly restructuring and pushing money into the future. The New Orleans Saints provided a good example of what not to do. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Pierce got paid for what he does well, which is deep speed and contested catches. It’s easier to replace Pitt with a guy like Allen than it is to replace Pierce. |
Kray. If you can’t afford him (Pittman) in a year you can always trade him then.
|
https://www.colts.com/team/depth-chart
They also announced the depth chart today. Not many surprises for me. We will definitely get run on, as we always have, When Buck and Grove aren't on the field. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.