You are a little slow at reading sarcasm lol
I dont even know who the fuck this player is.

Dam likes the guys with the physique and 40 times.

I know it when i hear it, im old. Could you use itallics next time?

I'm not saying anything about Lawrence. I"m saying Gary probably won't succeed anywhere in the NFL because he's a great athlete but a bad football player.

Stop stealing omaha’s lines


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Kelly is our second best olineman. So we wouldnt draft a center to play now.


LT is something that has to be addressed sooner than later. Having the opportunity to draft one of the top tackles in a heavy defensive draft means one of the top two or so will drop to 26.

Drafting the future LT and moving Smith to Guard over Glowinski makes the Oline more than "fine" it makes it great.

Glow would be great depth or if he beats out smith then so be it.

I believe one of our biggest needs is SS but after reading this article I say no way we should reach for one at 26. Obviously if one of the top NT or UT fall to us you grab them.

But OT is not a bad option at all.

Build the trenches the rest will fall into place

You think the D’s biggest need is at the backend of the squad when the need a legit passrusher up front?

Houstons a nice addition hes not freeny. Its a qb league and if you cant knock down the other teams qb, its hard to win

Costanzo is 30. Hardly looking to retire.

Here's what we're rooting for in the top 25 picks. At least:

3 QBs
1 RB
2 WRs
2 TEs
5 OL
2 LBs
2 CBs
4 DT
4 EDGE

If it breaks that way, there will be some really good options on the DL, SS, and WR for picks 26 and 34. The question marks are guys like Jacobs, Fant, Bradbury, and whoever people like as CB2. If those guys fall and teams take DL and SS at those spots, options get a lot more limited.

I'd much rather get Winovich at 59.

Coming out of the 1st & 2nd rounds with something like Simmons/Wilkins, Rapp/Abram, and an end like Winovich would be a fantastic haul. Then grab a corner or two and a WR in the middle rounds and the roster is chalk full of depth and potential.

Re: OL

Given the options that should be available at positions of need, I still doubt we see an OL taken until the 3rd at the earliest.

Kelly is great when healthy. He gets hurt and the offense takes a dive. We need a better quality backup. It would not surprise me if one of our first three picks is an offensive lineman. Ballard tends to put his money where his mouth is.