ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Hear me, Diamond Jim (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=156088)

albany ed 12-24-2022 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by apballin (Post 255337)
Or if we had a QB get rid of the ball in 3 seconds or less and doesn’t have the most turnovers of n the league….

Ballard definitely dropped the ball at LT

All GMs drop the ball some times. The almighty Polian that some folks here have knighted, dropped the ball when he traded Faulk for a song and then had to draft his equal in Edge. He could have kept Faulk a HOFer and traded the Edge pick to the Saints for every fucking draft pick they had that year. Adding that to their own, they would have been stacked for years.

apballin 12-25-2022 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albany ed (Post 255338)
All GMs drop the ball some times. The almighty Polian that some folks here have knighted, dropped the ball when he traded Faulk for a song and then had to draft his equal in Edge. He could have kept Faulk a HOFer and traded the Edge pick to the Saints for every fucking draft pick they had that year. Adding that to their own, they would have been stacked for years.

Fuckin Scioli and Peterson for Marshall Faulk

Dam8610 12-25-2022 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albany ed (Post 255338)
All GMs drop the ball some times. The almighty Polian that some folks here have knighted, dropped the ball when he traded Faulk for a song and then had to draft his equal in Edge. He could have kept Faulk a HOFer and traded the Edge pick to the Saints for every fucking draft pick they had that year. Adding that to their own, they would have been stacked for years.

Yes, and the Colts could've traded away the Luck pick for 5 1s, kept Peyton, and drafted Russell Wilson, but nobody but me saw that possibility.

Faulk was unhappy, and Edgerrin was just as good if not better at the time. Faulk would've walked in free agency, instead we got 7 years of James.

albany ed 12-25-2022 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 255375)
Yes, and the Colts could've traded away the Luck pick for 5 1s, kept Peyton, and drafted Russell Wilson, but nobody but me saw that possibility.

Faulk was unhappy, and Edgerrin was just as good if not better at the time. Faulk would've walked in free agency, instead we got 7 years of James.

Peyton was due 18 million dollar roster bonus before it was certain his neck would ever allow him to be Peyton again. So, it was risky.

Faulk wasn't unhappy, he just wanted his contract renegotiated. Polian said nobody renegotiates on my watch.

Dam8610 12-25-2022 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albany ed (Post 255376)
Peyton was due 18 million dollar roster bonus before it was certain his neck would ever allow him to be Peyton again. So, it was risky.

Faulk wasn't unhappy, he just wanted his contract renegotiated. Polian said nobody renegotiates on my watch.

Yes, the risk was Peyton falters and you have a rookie superstar on a rookie deal with 5 more first round picks.

omahacolt 12-25-2022 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by apballin (Post 255364)
Fuckin Scioli and Peterson for Marshall Faulk

holy shit i forgot about scioli

omahacolt 12-25-2022 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 255375)
Yes, and the Colts could've traded away the Luck pick for 5 1s, kept Peyton, and drafted Russell Wilson, but nobody but me saw that possibility.

Faulk was unhappy, and Edgerrin was just as good if not better at the time. Faulk would've walked in free agency, instead we got 7 years of James.

just look at this clown

Brylok 12-25-2022 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by omahacolt (Post 255391)
just look at this clown

It's just going to get worse the farther we stink. Hell, even I'm not immune to it.

Racehorse 12-26-2022 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 255387)
Yes, the risk was Peyton falters and you have a rookie superstar on a rookie deal with 5 more first round picks.

???

Chromeburn 12-26-2022 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles (Post 255266)
o


When Peyton Manning went down in 2011, the Colts went 2-14 without him.

When Andrew Luck suddenly and unexpectedly retired in 2019, the Colts went 7-9 with an average-at-best Jacoby Brissett at quarterback, and 6 out of those 9 losses were by 7 points or less.


https://www.jt-sw.com/football/pro/r...Teams/2019-ind


The very next year the Colts went out and got the least mobile quarterback in the NFL (a 39 year-old Philip Rivers), went 11-6 in the regular season, and took the Buffalo Bills right down to the wire in a playoff game on their homefield.


https://www.jt-sw.com/football/pro/r...Teams/2020-ind


And in that playoff game the statuesque, 39 year-old Rivers was literally untouched by the Bills' defense, let alone sacked.


https://www.jt-sw.com/football/boxes...ost-wc-ind-buf




Subsequently, in my rat's ass of an opinion, Ballard wasn't just us giving lip-service when he proclaimed that he was determined to build a complete team that was not extremely-reliant on an elite quarterback when he was first brought here in January of 2017.

o

I keep hearing that the build strategy is old, mostly from young fans who grew up with the 2000 Colts. The problem with the “modern build” strategy is that it’s dependent on finding a generational QB which is the hardest thing to do in sports. You either have to have the number one pick in the draft with one available that year (Burrow, Lawrence) or get extremely lucky in a deep QB draft class (Allen, Mahomes). And there are more misses at QB than hits for sure. Also young people tend to leave out we didn’t win the SB till we finally solidified the defensive line with a DT, Booger. And the running game came alive to take pressure off the passing game. Those Colts teams consistently got beat by Pat and Steeler teams who were more complete with investment in their lines.

People think Ballard just wants to make a running team with strong guards and a defense with strong DTs. That’s not true. He just happened to hit on an all-pro guard and an all-pro LB wary in his tenure bc he is good at drafting. He wants a complete team bc he thinks you win championships that way, but you still need a QB and he’s trying to find one.

A lot of this anti Ballard stuff I hear out of the radio guys on 1075. They don’t like him and think he is “smug.” So they go on these rants about him, but it’s really because they just don’t get along with him. I personally didn’t think he was bad in the interviews I listened to, I felt like they were pushing their opinion as if they had some say in the matter. When you’re a sports reporter and think you know more than the people on the team. But news flash, Polian was a huge dick, Grigson was a huge dick, it doesn’t matter, as long as they do their job. Plus McAfree seems to think he’s ok so I tend to think it’s the radio guys being sensitive. Also Dakich is an dick.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.