![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This would be ideal ...... 1) ) It would give Jaff unlimited room for the posting of his threads, every time the urge tickled his fancy. 2) ) It would not clutter up the General Discussion board. 3) ) It could be easily ignored by those who don't care enough to continue arguing about it. o |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
You haven't the faintest idea of what I am saying ??? And you have no idea why l Racehorse l merged most of the 25 political threads that you started in the last 6 weeks, either ??? Ignorance is bliss ...... your intention may not have been to clutter the General Discussion board, but anyone who hasn't been living on the moon can see that the countless political threads that you've been starting were doing that. o |
Quote:
If someone makes a section for politics I would put them there. No one was required to read them. |
Quote:
Placing threads in the correct forum is not the only decorum that ColtFreaks has. You managed to take a section of the board that was rarely visited in the first place, and pushed almost every non-political thread off of Page One. If you want to be obstinate and refuse to acknowledge that your countless political threads were clogging up the General Discussion board, fine ...... the fact that l Racehorse l merged almost all of those threads, coupled with the fact that the administrators of ColtFreaks are strongly considering having a separate section for politics only say otherwise. o |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
OK, point taken. Still, you did merge the threads upon suggestion, and you did suggest that we have a separate forum for politics, so I suspect that you understood the overall point that I was making and the reason why I made the request to merge the threads in the first place. o |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.