![]() |
Quote:
The Colts also had an injured kicker that bailed them out of one game (against the Broncos), but may have cost them several others. If Vinatieri were healthy, the Andrew Luckless Colts might have gone 8-8 or 9-7. o |
Quote:
Luck4Reich is absolutely correct that this plan is largely going as expected, with the exception of the Luck retirement that was out of the blue and would absolutely cripple almost any organization. Ballard has said several times that we needn’t worry about the cap space because it would be used up as the players he drafted began to develop. Guess what? That’s happening and sure enough that extra cap space now will prove very useful. However, because it will involve simply keeping our own players rather than bringing in new players, I’m sure it won’t seem to you like he’s done anything special since you won’t have to experience the frustration of being unable to pay for a Leonard, Nelson, Kelly, Castonzo, Mack or Moore (and yes, I know he's already signed) when they become eligible for free agency. Furthermore, just as these younger players are maturing, we will have the needed cap space to supplement this with a some premium free agents. The plan was for Luck to be around for all of this too, which might have made us unstoppable, but now we have that additional curveball that we’ll have to adjust to – again, however, the cap space will help there as well. |
Quote:
Filling the QB hole is a pretty big piece. You can’t really hide it in today’s NFL. They will have to upgrade it somehow. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Let Bridgewater compete with Brisket for the starting job. Our base DL looking like this would be pretty stunning: DE - Houston DT - Kinlaw DT - Harris DE - Sheard |
Quote:
|
Ah, good point, I forget Sheard was UFA... I think we resign him, but Autry may be in that slot.
We can likely get Sheard for < $7M a year (wrong side of 30 now), he's a veteran presence and get 5 sacks a year. If Harris and Kinlaw are disruptive in the middle he will have more opportunities. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
How close we would have been with a HEALTHY Andrew Luck. He wasn't. He wasn't through rehab. Let it go. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Hey, they beat the Chiefs on their home-field in Kansas City with Jacoby Brissett at QB ........ granted that that was only one game, but I suspect that they were not nearly as bad as they sometimes looked later in the season, particularly against the Saints. So as disappointing as it was to see the 2019 Colts go from a playoff contender with a 5-2 overall record to a mediocre 7-9 also-ran, I suspect that Chris Ballard's assertion that he was building a team that was not overly-dependent on one player (such as Peyton Manning and Andrew Luck) was not just lip service ........ for a fairly recent reference, the 2011 Peyton Manningless Colts were considerably worse than were the 2019 Andrew Luckless Colts. o |
Quote:
Let it go (fuck) yourself |
Quote:
|
Rappaport says Colts are Rivers most likely landing spot, get ready freaks i think it’s gonna happen
|
Quote:
So now it your turn, concentrate and see if you can guess what I’m thinking now. |
Quote:
Will he be Kerry Collins or a Matt Hasselbeck? Or a Peyton to Denver guy? Build the defense |
Quote:
I get what you are saying but i just dont think he has much left (and i am not a rivers hater like most here). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
"It seems right now the most logical spot would be the Indianapolis Colts, who havent ruled out anything, may be in the quarterback market. They grabbed Jacoby Brissett [whom] they have to make some decisions on, and they may still draft a quarterback. Right not that seems like the most logical spot for Rivers." I just don't see us doing it. |
Quote:
I think its just that we dont have a solid QB and the link to reich/sirianni. I dont see us signing rivers either. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Sure are enough places reporting Rivers likely going to the Colts from CBS sports to Sports Illustrated.
I never liked the guy and hate the Chargers but if we did and won a SB that would be ok. |
Quote:
Per Rapoport - KC will franchise tag Chris Jones. Obviously KC can still tag and trade. But right now, KC is saying that they want him back. https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1233065472989564929 Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Anyone else listen to JMV this afternoon???? He claims he got a phone call from a "colts insider" who regularly sources him credible info. This source is saying 0% chance that Colts go after Rivers. He also says that they are targeting a high profile free agent to throw big money on. Who knows what's true.....take it for what it's worth.
|
$100 says Clowney
|
Keeps us from resigning Sheard as well.
|
Quote:
Quote:
There were some Clowney rumors a month ago. Looks like Chris Jones will get the franchise tag, although the Chefs will have to cut people to do that and sign their picks, and sign Mahomes. I wonder if they really are talking a big FA, or they consider a middle tier big to them. Who else is out there? Cooper? Barrett? Ngakoue?... Tom Brady? :D |
Rather it be Ngakoue.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mahomes didn't start right away. If a Vet only signed for 2 years and we drafted a QB to grow behind them what's so bad about it? The vet is off the books after 2 years..... keep in mind that Ballard has left 45+ million in cap every year hes been here so why not? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.