ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum - Who do want Ballard to go after in a trade, FA or draft? QB ONLY thread

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)

- Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)

- - Who do want Ballard to go after in a trade, FA or draft? QB ONLY thread (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=116963)

So Rodgers just said his future seems uncertain with the packers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles (Post 185181)

o

The only way that they would have gotten a field goal there is with an incomplete pass, and then the kicker makes a 66-yarder ...... IF the defense had been playing what anybody who is not acting like they live on Mars had had them playing.

The Buccaneers had no timeouts, and there were only 8 seconds left to play in the half. The Packers should have had 9 defensive backs on the field, and they literally should have positioned 6 of them on the sidelines, 5 yards apart from the line of scrimmage at the 44 yardline, the 39 yardline, and the 34 yardline ........ that would have prevented a quick, sideline pass which (if successful) would have given the Buccaneers a chance for a closer field goal attempt. The remaining 3 defensive backs should have been positioned in the middle of the field at the 5 yardline. They could have given Brady and the Buccaneers ANYTHING THAT THEY WANTED in the middle of the field, because they had 0 timeouts and there were only 8 seconds left to play. That means that they would have had no chance to spike the ball after being tackled in-bounds. It would not have mattered if Brady had hit a receiver 10 yards downfield, 20 yards downfield, or even 30 yards downfield, because in all 3 of those situations the receiver would have been tackled in-bounds to end the half.

o

That’s like football 101. Really inexcusable that happened.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spike (Post 185175)

That was the defensive coordinators fault, they should have been playing zone. Worst case scenario was allowing just a field goal. The Packer coaches were shit yesterday.

Good point. The DC should definitely be gone for that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 185153)

I’ve heard differently. Know a few people that work for the team and stadium. That he was contemplating it after the playoff loss. The snowboard thing was true also.

Also heard a big scandal may hit the Colts this off season, hoping it isn’t true.

well you can't leave us hanging on that!

Quote:

Originally Posted by HoosierinFL (Post 185214)

well you can't leave us hanging on that!

No shit wtf

Quote:

Originally Posted by HoosierinFL (Post 185214)

well you can't leave us hanging on that!

I probably shouldn’t have said anything. This didn’t come from the Colt ppl I know. I could get in trouble for even saying anything. I will say it’s not cheating or anything like that. Recent PR stuff makes me think the Colts know, at least some do. Like I said, hopefully it doesn’t come to pass.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 185228)

Stafford likes the Colts?

It makes the most sense. Great front office. QB friendly coach. Good o-line (before Castanzo retired). Young WR's. Very good RB's. Young defense that is pretty good. It's an ideal situation to win now for an older QB.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 185228)

Stafford likes the Colts?

Tons of negative comments to that article.

I wanted Stafford last yr before they signed Rivers. I may be the only one on this site but I loved the Rivers signing. Hated that dude for 16 yrs but getting to know him through listening to the players and team and his own comments. I can see why the Charger fans loved him

Go get Stafford Chis!!!!