First Time Since October 6, 1985, 3rd Time in Franchise History

[Colts And Orioles]

o



For the first time since October 6th of 1985, and for the 3rd time ever in franchise history (1953 - Present), the Colts had two 100-yard rushers in the same game.



Albert Bentley and Randy McMillan did it for the Colts in a win over the Bills on that day in early October of 1985.


https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/198510060clt.htm



This afternoon, Marlon Mack and Jonathan Williams did it in the team's win against the Jaguars.


https://www.espn.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=401128075




SOURCE: ) Michael Marot (Associated Press) in Minnesota's Star Tribune


http://www.startribune.com/colts-overpower-jaguars-with-strong-ground-game-in-33-13-win/565066882/


o

[Colts And Orioles]

o



For the first time since October 6th of 1985, and for the 3rd time ever in franchise history (1953 - Present), the Colts had two 100-yard rushers in the same game.



Albert Bentley and Randy McMillan did it for the Colts in a win over the Bills on that day in early October of 1985.


https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/198510060clt.htm



This afternoon, Marlon Mack and Jonathan Williams did it in the team's win against the Jaguars.


https://www.espn.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=401128075




SOURCE: ) Michael Marot (Associated Press) in Minnesota's Star Tribune


http://www.startribune.com/colts-overpower-jaguars-with-strong-ground-game-in-33-13-win/565066882/


o
o


On a hunch, I looked up Alan Ameche's career game log ........ sure enough, he was involved in the only other game in Colts franchise history in which they had two 100-yard rushers.

Ameche and Lenny Moore did it in a win over the Browns on November 11th of 1956.



https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/195611110cle.htm


o

[Colt Classic]

o


On a hunch, I looked up Alan Ameche's career game log ........ sure enough, he was involved in the only other game in Colts franchise history in which they had two 100-yard rushers.

Ameche and Lenny Moore did it in a win over the Browns on November 11th of 1956.



https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/195611110cle.htm


o

Hunch my arse...the ticket to that game was your 21st birthday bash.

[Colts And Orioles]

o


On a hunch, I looked up Alan Ameche's career game log ........ sure enough, he was involved in the only other game in Colts franchise history in which they had two 100-yard rushers.

Ameche and Lenny Moore did it in a win over the Browns on November 11th of 1956.



https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/195611110cle.htm


o





Hunch, my arse ....... the ticket to that game was your 21st birthday bash.




o


Actually, that was shortly after my late mom's 21st birthday ........ she was born in late September of 1935.


o

[Colts And Orioles]

o


Jonathan Williams just had his second 100-plus yard game rushing in 4 days ........ that's quite a feet, considering that those are the only 2 games in which he has seen any real action in (he had 2 rushing attempts against the Dolphins a week-and-a-half ago.)


o

[Puck]

o


Jonathan Williams just had his second 100-plus yard game rushing in 4 days ........ that's quite a feet, considering that those are the only 2 games in which he has seen any real action in (he had 2 rushing attempts against the Dolphins a week-and-a-half ago.)


o

So you agree Mack is over rated. Thanks

[Colts And Orioles]

o


Jonathan Williams just had his second 100-plus yard game rushing in 4 days ........ that's quite a feet, considering that those are the only 2 games in which he has seen any real action in (he had 2 rushing attempts against the Dolphins a week-and-a-half ago.)


o







So you agree Mack is over rated. Thanks.




o


I don't know where that came from, but I never said nor insinuated that.


o

[Puck]

o


I don't know where that came from, but I never said nor insinuated that.


o


It reafirms what I have said over and over. Mack is as good as the Oline.

Trade Mack for a second and roll with Williams. Nothing lost

I say a second..... which I don't thinks he's worth.... but some stupid team will


We don't lose a step Mack is a productct of the Oline.

[Butter]

It reafirms what I have said over and over. Mack is as good as the Oline.

Trade Mack for a second and roll with Williams. Nothing lost

I say a second..... which I don't thinks he's worth.... but some stupid team will


We don't lose a step Mack is a productct of the Oline.

I have no desire to give him a big second contract, but he is better than Williams.

[Colts And Orioles]

o


Jonathan Williams just had his second 100-plus yard game rushing in 4 days ........ that's quite a feet, considering that those are the only 2 games in which he has seen any real action in (he had 2 rushing attempts against the Dolphins a week-and-a-half ago.)


o





So you agree Mack is over rated. Thanks.






o


I don't know where that came from, but I never said nor insinuated that.


o







It reafirms what I have said over and over. Mack is as good as the Oline.

Trade Mack for a second and roll with Williams. Nothing lost

I say a second..... which I don't thinks he's worth.... but some stupid team will


We don't lose a step Mack is a productct of the Oline.




o


I don't think that 2 excellent games by Williams necessarily reaffirms anything about Mack.

If you don't like Mack and/or think that he is overrated, fine. Don't put words in my mouth and/or assert that I believe something of which I never insinuated.


o

[Puck]

o


I don't think that 2 excellent games by Williams necessarily reaffirms anything about Mack.

If you don't like Mack and/or think that he is overrated, fine. Don't put words in my mouth and/or assert that I believe something of which I never insinuated.


o


So do you agree with my opinion of Mack?

[Puck]

I have no desire to give him a big second contract, but he is better than Williams.

But shows that Taking a running back high in the draft if you have a great offense of line is stupid. And Mack can be replaced easily

[Colts And Orioles]

So do you agree with my opinion of Mack?




o


No.


o